<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dysgeusia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/</link>
	<description>art &#8226; games &#8226; change</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  Don't you just hate that?  Like reviewing a movie based on the trailer, innit?  ;-)

Surely this assessment is an incomplete one but it is based on seeing a &lt;a href="http://stanford-online.stanford.edu/courses/cs547/060127-cs547-100.asx" rel="nofollow"&gt;detailed demo&lt;/a&gt; with low-res display along with bunches of high-res &lt;a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/2300-10877_11-6048111-1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;screen shots&lt;/a&gt; (that appeared just yesterday).  I also showed a few of those screens to a naive user (the target audience) who found the UI fairly overwhelming.

Regardless, I really did mean it when I said that this stronger focus on UI is a good thing and I agree the proof is in the pudding.  I will certainly try out the final version and I'm happy to eat my words if the change is a positive one.  I'm just not particularly holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  Don&#8217;t you just hate that?  Like reviewing a movie based on the trailer, innit?  ;-)</p>
<p>Surely this assessment is an incomplete one but it is based on seeing a <a href="http://stanford-online.stanford.edu/courses/cs547/060127-cs547-100.asx" rel="nofollow">detailed demo</a> with low-res display along with bunches of high-res <a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/2300-10877_11-6048111-1.html" rel="nofollow">screen shots</a> (that appeared just yesterday).  I also showed a few of those screens to a naive user (the target audience) who found the UI fairly overwhelming.</p>
<p>Regardless, I really did mean it when I said that this stronger focus on UI is a good thing and I agree the proof is in the pudding.  I will certainly try out the final version and I&#8217;m happy to eat my words if the change is a positive one.  I&#8217;m just not particularly holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microscopiq.com/2006/03/dysgeusia/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Ok, it doesn't LOOK particularly nice, but it is a bit unfair to rant away without actually having used it! I've encountered plenty of UI that looked hard/unusable/etc. but was surprisingly easy to use once you tried it out....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it doesn&#8217;t LOOK particularly nice, but it is a bit unfair to rant away without actually having used it! I&#8217;ve encountered plenty of UI that looked hard/unusable/etc. but was surprisingly easy to use once you tried it out&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
