Comments on: Ancel Rides Again http://microscopiq.com/2006/05/ancel-rides-again/ art • games • change Sun, 13 May 2012 00:29:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Jason http://microscopiq.com/2006/05/ancel-rides-again/comment-page-1/#comment-81 Jason Thu, 04 May 2006 13:31:15 +0000 http://microscopiq.com/2006/05/ancel-rides-again/#comment-81 Yeah, I suppose tanked might be a little strong -- I'll change it to underperformed. Still, Hollywood tends to judge the success of movies based on profits in the US alone and the average promotional costs for a movie like King Kong (not disclosed on the site) would add another $50-100 mil. So, it didn't break even state-side. For a tanker nobody can dispute, recall Michael Bay's modern classic <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=island05.htm">The Island</a>. Yeah, I suppose tanked might be a little strong — I’ll change it to underperformed. Still, Hollywood tends to judge the success of movies based on profits in the US alone and the average promotional costs for a movie like King Kong (not disclosed on the site) would add another $50-100 mil. So, it didn’t break even state-side.

For a tanker nobody can dispute, recall Michael Bay’s modern classic The Island.

]]> By: Jose http://microscopiq.com/2006/05/ancel-rides-again/comment-page-1/#comment-80 Jose Thu, 04 May 2006 13:15:29 +0000 http://microscopiq.com/2006/05/ancel-rides-again/#comment-80 I can't see how making a tidy profit (U$300,000,000 aprox) can be considered "tanked"... (production budget = $200 million, worldwide gross = $550million). I can’t see how making a tidy profit (U$300,000,000 aprox) can be considered “tanked”… (production budget = $200 million, worldwide gross = $550million).

]]>